(I might be a little biased, being her mother and all.)
In keeping with Heroines of Fantasy's mission to keep female characters real, viable, and plentiful, Jamie gives us her defense of Sansa Stark. ~Terri-Lynne DeFino
Prologue
Before in this article you’re embroiled,
And through each sentence you’ve toiled--
If you still yet
aspire
To read A Song of Ice and Fire
Don’t read this! The
books will be spoiled!
Seriously guys. If you haven’t read the books yet…
*waits patiently for the door to close* Are they gone? Okay
fabulous.
I love Sansa Stark.
Yes. That Sansa Stark. Saccharine, dewy-eyed, froo froo,
mean to Tyrion, misguided Sansa Stark. Know that scene in Beauty and the Beast when Gaston shows the townsfolk the image of
the roaring Beast in the mirror, and they all get their pitchforks, and Belle
is all “No! You don’t understand! He’s my friend!”? That’s how I feel among a
lot of Game of Thrones fans when I try to defend Sansa. But, ever the optimist
(like Sansa, y’all!), I’m going to do
so here, at the request of Mama
Bogwitch. In the interest of avoiding “tl;dr”s in the comments, I’ll keep
it to a few quick points.
Complaint: Sansa
is so girly! Ugh! She’s such a little
priss! She always has to be such a perfect
lady! Give me Arya any day!
Retort:
Am I going to argue that Sansa is kickass in the same way
that Brienne, Dany, or Asha are kickass? Absolutely not. She’s certainly nothing
at all like Arya, her plucky (and, if I’m being very honest, sort of
stereotypical) sister. I’m not even going to argue that Sansa isn’t “girly.”
She’s the definition of cisgender.
But here’s my problem, and it very much frames the way I look at Sansa: why
can’t we respect strength or intelligence in women unless it subverts gender
norms? What does it say that we can only admire a character if their courage is
in keeping with traditionally male modes of behavior? One of Sansa’s most
oft-repeated refrains is “Courtesy is a lady’s armor.” I feel it is often
dismissed by readers, or presented as further evidence that Sansa is only
interested in being nice. Yet when Lord Varys flounces about all perfumed,
pretty, and demure, hiding his true nature and cunning behind a flowery
exterior, we praise his ability to use people’s assumptions to his advantage.
Complaint: It’s
Sansa’s fault Ned is dead!
Retort:
While I can’t say she didn’t have a part in the way things went down, she’s eleven. Know what I was doing at eleven? Collecting comic
books trading cards and wearing macramé vests. Everyone is stupid when they’re
eleven. Furthermore, do you know how
many people conspired to get Ned imprisoned? Basically the whole small
council, plus Cersei and her minions, plus the Gold Cloaks. Do you think all
those people needed the complacency
of a little girl to carry out their plot? Above and beyond all that, Joffrey went all
wildcard on everyone and decided he wanted Ned executed. So Ned’s death is in
no way on Sansa.
Complaint: Sansa
just lets things happen to her! She’s
passive!
Retort:
After Ned dies and Sansa learns that “life is not a song,”
Sansa—a sheltered lord’s daughter who has never spent time among the intrigues
of court—is in over her head and she knows it. Rather than immediately leap to
what would inevitably be an ill-conceived plot to escape her situation, she
spends some time playing to her strengths (remember: courtesy is a lady’s
armor) while she figures things out. What happens to her is not pretty, but she
lives through all of it. I don’t think a character who went about things more
aggressively could say the same.
Complaint: Sansa
is so naïve! She trusts Littlefinger!
I can’t like someone that stupid.
Retort:
Oh of course not. You would never love a character like that.
(pic of Littlefinger with knife at Ned's throat removed. Many gifs and pics removed. We just won't go into that.)
10 comments:
Love the gifs. You are the queen of snark.
I have made it a point to write female characters akin to Sansa. In Beyond the Gate, the criticism I've gotten (and alternately praise) concerned my main character, Linhare. She's nice. She works within the parameters of her own form of power to do what has to be done. Can she wield a sword, well--not really. Can she climb a rope? Can she karate-chop someone in the neck? Not effectively. But she, like Sansa, is of the "Courtesy is a lady's armor" variety.
She is exactly who I wanted her to be. I do have other sorts of "strong" female characters. I love them too, but I, too, can't stand the notion that a woman can only be strong if she's acting "like a man."
Jamie, thanks so much for being our guest today! I can see you inherited your mother's devotion to defending 'underdog' characters. :)
I think the debate about Sansa gets a little confusing because there are two different Sansas: Sansa in Martin's novels, and Sansa in the HBO series.
I think they've done a good job with her character in the HBO adaptation, but I was never too keen on Sansa in the novels.
Whether or not you like Sansa, I'm surprised that anyone would blame Sansa for Ned Stark's death. Sansa? Really? If we must lay the blame at anyone's doorstep, I'd say Ned is responsible for Ned Stark's death.
Here's a little known fact about Sansa: It's also the name of the national airline of Costa Rica. ;)
Karin...really?? Hhahahahaa! I love it.
I do like how the actress portrays Sansa in the series, and I understand they've made her "older" than in the books to make some of the things that happen more acceptable. Despite what I know about the books and the show, I was still surprised when Tyrion asks her how old she is (in one of last season's episodes) she tells him, "Fourteen."
Egads! I do think the books let her stay as young as she is actually supposed to be--giving her that innocence that allows her to both be foolish, and allows her to grow as savvy as Arya. Both she and Dany are SO much older-seeming in the HBO series, it's often difficult to justify the things they do, say, and trust.
Karin-- the only difference between the Bogwitch and me in our defending of the underdogs: she needs them to be redeemed and I don't! ;-)
Funny you mention the "two different Sansas" phenomenon, because while I like the actress who portrays Sansa, I think she was written TERRIBLY in Season 1. Petulant, bratty, rude--so not Sansa. That scene where she is mean to Septa Mordane? The REAL Sansa would NEVER do that. That said, show Sansa in Season 2 has been VERY well done indeed, writing, acting, everything. I think it's been true to the book but with a nuance that brings depth and a new perspective to readers and viewers alike.
And I DID know about the airline because I took it on a trip there about 10 years ago.
...oh shit, that was 10 years ago. *weeps softly*
Great post!
I don't blame Sansa for trusting Littlefinger because I did too . . . and kept trusting him too long after his real nature became clear.
Shauna--I just couldn't trust anyone named "Littlefinger." Just couldn't.
(Terri, posting with our user name)
You know, I loathed Sansa when I read the first books (I've only read up to 'Feast for Crows', which means it's been a lot of years since I read them), and yet she's the one character who's really stuck with me.
Now THAT is the sign of a fantastic character in my view - the ones we remember years after the event!
Also - I love your final 'word' of the post! Poor naive Ned.
Jenny--Yes, poor, naive, noble Ned. Notice that it is the unbendable who die in a Song of Ice and Fire. Ned. Vaserys. Robert. Robb. I won't go on, because you've not read past those.
I, too, detested Sansa in the beginning, and here is a case that shows Mr. Martin at his best character building. No one is supposed to like Sansa. She's a spoiled, silly girl who holds on to fantasy even when it is proven false, even dangerous. But she grows. Martin doesn't change the core of who she is, but she evolves.
Likewise--take Littlefinger. In the beginning, Martin has him a sympathetic character. He was passed over by his one, true love and has never loved another. But he too evolves without changing his core.
With both Sansa and Littlefinger, looks can be decieving. Peeling back the layers of these amazingly drawn characters is one of the reasons these books are so freaking awesome.
La C:
THANK YOU. I think people forget how naive they were at 11, and she's playing on HER strengths to survive her situation. If she was in Arya's shoes and vice-versa, they'd both be dead. (Also, if we adjust for show ages, my argument is the same. TWEENS.)
I've seen arguments that ugh, Sansa is the norm, blah blah blah. That's not my experience in such forms of fantasy heroines. She's the "norm" of a highborn lady in her environment, but strong women who buck the trend are who we see as heroines of fantasy novels.
I love to think I'd be Arya or Dany in this universe, but I wouldn't. I'd be Sansa. There are times in my life where I'd be much more like Arya, but right now, I'd have to say that current Jenna would be able to play to saying the things expected in order to gauge my situation and survive by playing the game, which I think she is doing at this point.
Jenna--I see you are here from the Powder Room or one of Jamie's Jezebel venues--as you call her La C. :)
Sansa started out being one of my least favorite characters, but ended up being one of my MOST favorites. I did not intentionally create my own character (Linhare, in Beyond the Gate) to mimic her. Actually, I wrote her before I ever read the books, but she is the same kind of character. The same kind of strong and resourceful.
"Courtesy is a lady's armor." Come ON! How kickass is that. She don't need no sword and maille! Words, baby. Words and cunning. That's our girl!
(Terri DeFino here. This computer doesn't allow me to post as ME for some reason. I don't ask it questions, and it continues to let me work on it...sometimes.)
Post a Comment